ResearchThis! Home
   
Google
 
Web www.researchthisstuff.com
 
Topic:
Business, Finance - Derivatives
 
Title:
Derivative Hedging: Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas
 
e-mail this to a friend
Creation Date:
12/2001
 
Page 1 - Page 2
   
Submit Your Own Research!

 

  Derivative Hedging: Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corp. (cont.)

Hand-Picked Links Chosen for Content-

 
 Regression Analysis

 

The following independent variables were used for the regression model (34 monthly observations, November 1998-September 2001):
 

·         % Change in Fed Funds rate

·         % Change in Month-Average Temperature, Southern Region of US

·         % Change in Natural Gas Prices (Henry Hub)

·         % Change S&P 500 Index Price

·         Weather Factor Index

 

The data resulted in the following regression model:

 ri = .071 + .711(%DFedFunds)+1.058(%DSP500)-.186(%DNaturalGas)+.19(%DTemperature)+.029(WeatherFactor)+.17

Interpretation of Coefficients:

 

B0 = .071 represents the average monthly return on LD stock if the independent variables were 0.  This represents the slope intercept.

 

Independent variable coefficients:  ri changes by bi for each unit change in X, all else constant.  For example:  For each percent change in the Fed Funds rate, the monthly return on LD stock will change by .711%, if all other independent variables remain constant.

 

E = .17, the amount in which the observations of LD rate of return deviates from the estimated values.

 

Interpretation of other regression output:

 

Regression Statistics

Multiple R

0.490340722

R Square

0.240434023

Adjusted R Square

0.104797242

Standard Error

0.17668101

Observations

34

 

R Squared: 24% of the variation in the return on LD observations can be explained by the linear relationship with the independent variables.  The adjusted R squared takes into consideration the sample size and makes adjustments for small or large amount of observations.


 

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

 

 

df

SS

MS

F

Significance F

Regression

5

0.276673905

0.055335

1.772631

0.15107

Residual

28

0.874053023

0.031216

 

 

Total

33

1.150726929

 

 

 

 

The ANOVA output shows the variation of the rate of return on LD stock that is explain by the variation of independent variables is .276 (SS-Reg).  Consequently, the unexplained variation is .87 (SS-Res).  In summary, this favors the idea that there is not a strong relationship between the variation in the independent variables and the rate of return on LD stock.

 

 

Coefficients

Standard Error

P-value

Intercept

0.070948411

0.032681711

0.038572

%DFedFunds

0.711703658

0.71189488

0.326002

%DSP500

1.057716564

0.64815377

0.1139

%DNatGas

-0.186316448

0.159877285

0.253701

%DWeather

0.190093133

0.24924214

0.452029

Weather Factor

0.028730755

0.012829416

0.033251

 

Looking at the independent variables on an individual bases, some observations can be made.  The coefficients, as discussed in the model above,  determine the rate of change in the dependent variable, rate of return on LD stock, for a given change in the independent variable.  The standard error gives the amount in which the estimated Y value (dependent variable – r of LD stock) deviates from the actual sample.  The P-Value is used to determine the marginal contribution of the independent variable in predicting the dependent variable.  The lower the P-value, the more that particular variable’s variance contributed to the variance of the rate of return on LD stock.

 

Overall Summary

 

Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corp. has significant exposure to interest rate changes, natural gas price changes, and changes in weather (as a major factor of natural gas price demand changes).  To hedge against these exposures, the company enters into various derivative contracts resulting in an offset of potential asset value or cash flow fluctuations.  Although LD hedges less than half of it’s significant commodity and interest rate risks, my regression analysis did not show that the independent variables were strong predictors of rate of return on LD stock.  This phenomenon may be attributed to a delayed price impact, a non-linear relationship between risk factors and the stock price, or the existence of collinearity in the supplied data.


Works Sited

 

Historical Stock Data

www.dailystocks.com

 

Fed Funds Rate Data

www.econmagic.com

 

Temperature Data

http://www.nws.noaa.gov/

 

Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Financial Information

2000 Annual Report

Form 10-k Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2000

 

 



[1] The weather factor represents the additional temperature beyond a predicted average.  The formula looks at the 106-year average for a given month.  If the average is above 65, it is a cooling month, below 65 is a heating month.  For a cooling month, the model subtracts the current mean temp from the historic mean temp and vise versa for heating months.  This will produce a negative number for cooler than average summer days and warmer than average winter days.  A positive number is generated for the opposite situations.  Data for “shoulder months”, those months in which the average temperature falls near 65 (typically spring and fall) were excluded. A scale know as heating and cooling days is commonly used in the energy business.  This topic is discussed at: http://www.usatoday.com/weather/wenerg1.htm

 

 
 

home browse contact

© copyright 2004-2005 iMarket Ventures, LLC