Topic: |
Business, Finance - Derivatives |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Title: | Derivative Hedging: Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas
|
||
| Creation Date: | 12/2001
|
Page 1 - Page 2
|
|
| Derivative Hedging: Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corp. (cont.) | Hand-Picked Links Chosen for Content- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following independent variables were used for the regression model (34 monthly observations, November 1998-September 2001): · % Change in Fed Funds rate · % Change in Month-Average Temperature, Southern Region of US · % Change in Natural Gas Prices (Henry Hub) · % Change S&P 500 Index Price · Weather Factor Index The data resulted in the following regression model: ri = .071 + .711(%DFedFunds)+1.058(%DSP500)-.186(%DNaturalGas)+.19(%DTemperature)+.029(WeatherFactor)+.17 B0 = .071 represents the average monthly return on LD stock if the independent variables were 0. This represents the slope intercept. Independent variable coefficients: ri changes by bi for each unit change in X, all else constant. For example: For each percent change in the Fed Funds rate, the monthly return on LD stock will change by .711%, if all other independent variables remain constant. E = .17, the amount in which the observations of LD rate of return deviates from the estimated values. Interpretation of other regression output:
R Squared: 24% of the variation in the return on LD observations can be explained by the linear relationship with the independent variables. The adjusted R squared takes into consideration the sample size and makes adjustments for small or large amount of observations.
The ANOVA output shows the variation of the rate of return on LD stock that is explain by the variation of independent variables is .276 (SS-Reg). Consequently, the unexplained variation is .87 (SS-Res). In summary, this favors the idea that there is not a strong relationship between the variation in the independent variables and the rate of return on LD stock.
Looking at the independent variables on an individual bases, some observations can be made. The coefficients, as discussed in the model above, determine the rate of change in the dependent variable, rate of return on LD stock, for a given change in the independent variable. The standard error gives the amount in which the estimated Y value (dependent variable – r of LD stock) deviates from the actual sample. The P-Value is used to determine the marginal contribution of the independent variable in predicting the dependent variable. The lower the P-value, the more that particular variable’s variance contributed to the variance of the rate of return on LD stock. Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corp. has significant exposure to interest rate changes, natural gas price changes, and changes in weather (as a major factor of natural gas price demand changes). To hedge against these exposures, the company enters into various derivative contracts resulting in an offset of potential asset value or cash flow fluctuations. Although LD hedges less than half of it’s significant commodity and interest rate risks, my regression analysis did not show that the independent variables were strong predictors of rate of return on LD stock. This phenomenon may be attributed to a delayed price impact, a non-linear relationship between risk factors and the stock price, or the existence of collinearity in the supplied data. Works Sited Historical Stock Data
Fed Funds Rate Data
Temperature Data
Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Financial Information
2000 Annual Report Form 10-k Fiscal Year Ended [1] The weather factor represents the additional temperature beyond a predicted average. The formula looks at the 106-year average for a given month. If the average is above 65, it is a cooling month, below 65 is a heating month. For a cooling month, the model subtracts the current mean temp from the historic mean temp and vise versa for heating months. This will produce a negative number for cooler than average summer days and warmer than average winter days. A positive number is generated for the opposite situations. Data for “shoulder months”, those months in which the average temperature falls near 65 (typically spring and fall) were excluded. A scale know as heating and cooling days is commonly used in the energy business. This topic is discussed at: http://www.usatoday.com/weather/wenerg1.htm |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© copyright 2004-2005 iMarket Ventures, LLC |
|||||